Legal Opinion
Armborst v. Cincinnati Traction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1928No. 4961PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
This writ is brought to review a judgment for defendant in an action for -personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff while a passenger upon defendant’s street car line. The assignments presented relate to the admission and rejection of evidence, the charge of the court, and the questioning of the jurors upon their voir dire.
1. Plaintiff testified that the ear stopped at the intersection of Twelfth and Walnut streets, that the motorman opened the door, and she stepped her right foot down on the first step, and that, as she had her left foot in the air…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Peirce v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Sandals v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- James Kiernan and Mary Kiernan v. Gerald Van Schaik, T/a Van's Atlantic StationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Carney v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Overland Const. Co. v. SydnorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Valley Shoe Corp. v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.