Legal Opinion

United States v. Henry F. Bell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1965No. 16231_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.

This cause is on appeal from a judgment of conviction in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Henry F. Bell, defendant-appellant, referred to herein as defendant, was found guilty by a jury on the third count of a three-count indictment. Count three 1 charged that he corruptly endeavored to obstruct and impede the administration of justice in the trial of United States v. James R. Hoffa and Commercial Carriers, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, in violation of Section 1503, 2 Title 18,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Timothy Leary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Edward J. Barry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Francisco S.A. Ignacio and Antonio S.A. Ignacio v. People of the Territory of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API