Legal Opinion

Eames v. Home Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1877No. 260PublishedCited by 91 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United-States for the Southern District of Illinois. The facts are' stated in the opinion of the court. .

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This is a bill in equity filed in the court below by Eames and Cooley, the appellants, against the Home Insurance Company of New York; the appellees, to require said company to issue to the complainants a policy of insurance against loss or damage by fire, in pursuance of a contract for that purpose alleged to have been made with their agents in Illinois, and for such other and further relief as shall be just and equitable. The court below, upon hearing, dismissed the bill.

The contract referred to is alleged to have been made by means of certain parol communications and written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Insurance Co. v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Zannini v. Reliance Insurance of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cottingham v. National Mutual Church InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Home Insurance v. AdlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API