Legal Opinion

Wells v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1945No. 32373PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This original action involves the validity of allocations made under the act construed in Wells v. Childers, 196 Okla. 339, 165 P. 2d 358. Therein was tested constitutionality of House Bill 518, Title 74, S.L. 1945, ch. 1, p. 376, and upon consideration of the attack in whole on the specific grounds mentioned, the appropriation, except as to section 3 (by its terms transferring $200,000 to the fund, not then necessary to be decided) was sustained with approval of the legislative “policy and purpose to protect the state, in the interim between its sessions, from evil effects due to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Riley v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Dixon v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 332Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. HO v. TULSA SPINE & SPECIALTY HOSPITALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. TREAT v. STITTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API