Cable v. Kitchen Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam.
Defendant assigns as error the following excerpt from the charge: “The court charges you as a matter of law that the duty devolves upon the defendant to furnish the plaintiff a reasonably safe place to work, reasonably safe machinery, appliances, and that they should be operated in a reasonably safe way.”
This instruction is in direct conflict with what was said in Owen v. Lumber Co., 185 N. C., 612; Gaither v. Clement, 183 N. C., 455; Tritt v. Lumber Co., 183 N. C., 830; Smith v. R. R., 182 N. C., 296, and must be held for reversible error.
Speaking to the question in Murphy v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Smith v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Tritt v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- O'Brien v. . Parks Cramer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Lindsey v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hall v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.