Hall v. . Rhinehart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The trial judge charged the jury as follows: (a) “The law of North Carolina requires the defendant, if they set up a mess hall of their own, to put it where those who work for them and eat at the mess hall would be reasonably safe from the operations of the company.(b)“If you find that the company failed to provide him with a reasonably safe place in which to do its work or to eat his meals and the evidence in this case satisfies you of that fact by its greater weight, you will answer that issue yes.”(c) “You will take into consideration, the law says, his age, his habits, his intellect, his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Murphy v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Fry v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- O'Brien v. . Parks Cramer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Allen Ex Rel. Holderby v. Edna Cotton Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929