Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
There was evidence on the part of plaintiff tending to show that in February, 1919, plaintiff, an employee of defendant company, was engaged in skidding logs from the woods to the company’s “landing,” this being done by hitching a team of horses to four or five logs, or more, at a time, coupled together, the double trees being hitched to iron grabs fastened in the foremost log, and leaving about six feet between this log and the horses. That the driver, who was on the ground, guided the horses by check lines, and there were supplied to plaintiff lines that were too short to enable…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tritt v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by11 opinions
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Murphy v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bradford v. EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.