Legal Opinion

Snavely v. Redemptorist Fathers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1942No. Appeal, 225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is a Workmen’s Compensation, Case involving the question whether the claimant’s employment was casual in character and not in the regular course of the business of the defendant.

On February 6, 1941, claimant filed a claim petition for total disability from October 9, 1940, alleging that on October 9, 1940, he suffered a fracture of two lumbar vertebrae, as a result of an accident in the course of his employment with the defendant and that he had been totally disabled from that time, as a result thereof.

On March 1, 1941, an answer was filed by the defendant, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Blake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Fedak v. DzialdowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Parisi v. Freedom Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Bordo v. Grayek (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plankinton v. SchurrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Black v. CorderTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Flaherty Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Miller Motor Mart v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API