Legal Opinion

Black v. Corder

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. Tfie facts are as follows:

Frank Black owned and operated a combination service station and appliance store located at 2885 Summer Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee using, in this business, seven to nine employees. He decided to build a retaining wall across tfie rear of this property, in order to stop erosion of dirt and water, and also to enlarge the building housing tfie appliances.

Black was not experienced in construction work. Robert Corder and Vernon Crain, normally employed by a construction company, were experienced in such work. At this particular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Brady v. ReedTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mason-Dixon Lines, Inc. v. LettTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Snavely v. Redemptorist FathersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Locken v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feathers v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Creek v. MacLennanTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Raul Martinez v. Davids Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API