Legal Opinion

Bordo v. Grayek (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1939No. Appeals, 24 and 25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

On December 6,1932, while James R. Bordo and Fred Catanzaro, the respective claimants in the above entitled workmen’s compensation cases, were engaged in plastering a moving picture theater and office building, then under construction, the scaffolding upon which they were standing broke with the result that each suffered severe injuries — Bordo, a crushed heel, and Catanzaro, a broken pelvis and spinal injuries. Both were totally disabled at the date of the hearing and Catanzaro will be for an indefinite period.

Contending they were in the employ of E. B. Grayek and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Gardner v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Anstead v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Germantown Dairy Co. v. McCallumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deviney v. J. H. France Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Snavely v. Redemptorist FathersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Diviney v. J. H. France Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API