Legal Opinion
City of Hartford v. Anderson Fairoaks, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 1986No. 3368PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
This appeal arises out of a judgment for the defendants John W. Huntington,1 Henry Darbee *592and John L. Dollard,2 who were the architects employed by the plaintiff in connection with the construction of the Burgdorf Health Center in Hartford. The plaintiff has appealed to this court after its motion to set aside a defendants’ verdict was denied. The plaintiff claims error in several of the trial court’s rulings, and in its charge to the jury. We find error.
The jury could have reasonably found the following facts. In 1966, the plaintiff contracted with the defendants for their design and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sturdivant v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Freedman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Chapman v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Zimny v. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.