Legal Opinion
Kaiser Aetna v. Deal
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 1978No. Civ. 41418PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Kaiser Aetna and Deal Development Company (both partnerships) appeal from orders of the superior court quashing the service of summons on several nonresident defendants in an action brought by appellants to recover damages for fraud, breach of contract, and other alleged wrongs. At the same time the action was dismissed as to all the same defendants. The question on appeal is whether the court acted correctly when it determined that the California courts could not lawfully exercise jurisdiction over the respondents.
No extended discussion is required as to one of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mansour v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Taylor-Rush v. Multitech Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Goehring v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.