Legal Opinion

Taylor-Rush v. Multitech Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1990No. A043187PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

Plaintiff/appellant Cheryl Taylor-Rush appeals an order quashing service of summons on six nonresident corporate officers and directors 1 in her action against them and a nonresident corporation for breach of contract, fraud, conspiracy to defraud and other alleged wrongs. At issue is the applicability of the so-called “fiduciary shield doctrine.”

Facts

Appellant’s complaint charged respondents with breach of contract, fraud, breach of a written employment contract, breach of an agreement to convey stock, conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to induce a breach of contract, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Pavlovich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Mansour v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Goehring v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API