Legal Opinion

Goehring v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1998No. D029568PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

Judith E. Bernier and others (plaintiffs) purchased pay telephone units as investments from Amtel Communications, Inc. (Amtel), a California corporation. After Amtel filed for bankruptcy, plaintiffs filed a class action alleging the investment scheme was fraudulent and violated several California statutes. Plaintiffs named numerous defendants, including Texas residents Dennis H. Goehring and Pete William Catalena, general partners of a Texas partnership that sold pay telephone units to Amtel. Goehring and Catalena (sometimes petitioners) petitioned for writ of mandate,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. DVI, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Asshauer v. Farallon Capital Partners, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. HealthMarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API