Legal Opinion
Mansour v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 13, 1995No. Docket Nos. G017434, G017528, G017555PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, J.
Petitioners Ernest P. Mansour and the law firm of Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack & Manos Co. L.P.A. (MGGM), Sue Anna Cellini and Emil Askew separately moved to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction. The superior court denied each motion and the parties have petitioned this court to overturn the superior court’s rulings. Since each petition arises from the same case and involves similar facts we consolidated the petitions for review. While real parties in interest Ralph Eidem, Jr., and Commercial Surety Bond Agency, Inc. (CSBA; collectively Eidem), attack the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- MacKey v. Compass Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Santa Fe Technologies, Inc. v. Argus Networks, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Pavlovich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Goehring v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.