Legal Opinion

Wood v. Foster

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1934No. 5 Div. 185PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The purpose of the bill was to invoke the jurisdiction of a court of equity under the provisions of the statute (Code, § 6439 et seq.) to establish an ancient and agreed dividing line between cotei'minous- landowners.

The statute has been recently construed and applied in Yauger v. Taylor, 218 Ala. 235, 118 So. 271; Smith et al. v. Cook, 220 Ala. 338, 124 So. 898; Clarke v. Earnest, 224 Ala. 165, 139 So. 223; Camp v. Dunnavent, 215 Ala. 78, 109 So. 362.

It is suggested by appellant that, where the evidence is by depositions and affidavits, not given orally in open court, no…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Copeland v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Butler v. Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Bonds v. BondsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API