Legal Opinion
Bonds v. Bonds
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 14, 1937No. 7 Div. 451PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill was for cancellation of mortgage and foreclosure deed for fraud.
The evidence was given orally before the court that rendered judgment and the decree of cancellation is supported by the presumption that obtains. Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171; Casey v. Cooledge and Macuk (Ala.Sup.) 175 So. 557; Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62; Howell v. City of Dothan, ante, p. 158, 174 So. 624; Wood v. Foster, 229 Ala. 430, 157 So. 863.
The evidence is in conflict; has been carefully examined and supports the decree rendered. It would serve no good purpose to discuss…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- McClurkin v. McClurkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Odom v. AverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Randolph v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Gamble v. GambleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Body v. BodyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Puckett v. PuckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.