Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Warren

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1926No. 6 Div. 514PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The action at law was duly transferred to the equity docket, and the pleadings were shaped accordingly. Stover v. Hill, 208 Ala. 575, 94 So. 826.

The bill sought reformation of a conveyance of land because of mutual mistake so as to describe the lands sold to defendant’s 'grantor, and the establishment of a division line. The present owner and his original grantor, the grantee in complainant’s conveyance, are proper parties respondent. The persons having the legal title to the subject-matter must be made parties to such a bill. Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171.

Courts of equity are given…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Alexander v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Fenno v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  5. Brown v. CockerellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Brantley v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API