Guigne v. Guigne
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Here we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting child and spousal support amounts that exceed appellant’s total monthly income. Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that appellant’s extensive property holdings and the existence of special circumstances permit a deviation from codified support guidelines.
Appellant contends that the trial court exceeded its authority by effectively forcing him to sell his ancestral home and other inherited separate property to perpetuate an excessive level of marital spending. Appellant *1357asserts that the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Destein v. DesteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Marriage of BufordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cryer v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Macilwaine v. Macilwaine (In re Macilwaine), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Manfer v. ManferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bodo v. BodoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.