Legal Opinion

LaBrosse v. Trustees of the Asbestos Workers Local 47 Retirement Trust Plan

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 26, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, 1 participants in the Asbestos Workers Local 47 Retirement Trust Plan (the “Plan”), and “pensioners” under the terms of the Plan, filed this action against the Plan and its Trustees, 2 challenging amendments to the Plan which affect the calculation of their retirement benefits. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow this Court finds in favor of the Defendants.

I

The Plan is an “employee pension benefit plan” within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(2)(A), and is accordingly governed by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mead Corp. v. TilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Richard J. Rybarczyk, Minoru Mizuba, and William Rittenhouse v. Trw, Inc. And Trw Salaried Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thornton v. Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Supplemental Retirement & Disability FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Boyd v. General Revenue Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
  3. Charles Thornton v. Graphic Commmunications ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API