Legal Opinion
Boyd v. General Revenue Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 7, 2013No. 3:11-cv-1243PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, William A. Boyd, filed this pro se action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et al, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, against the Defendants: General Revenue Corporation (“GRC”), United Student Aid Fund, Inc. (“USA Funds”) and Sallie Mae Inc.1 (“Sallie Mae”). Plaintiffs claims are that Defendants violated the TCPA and the FDCPA by their repeated telephone calls to Plaintiffs home and work as well as to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone to collect an allegedly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chet Michael Wilson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Minero Chavez Huao v. Eric RokoskyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2022