Legal Opinion
Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 1979No. 48037, 48042PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
Following our remand in Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville, 310 Minn. 32, 245. N.W.2d 445 (1976), this appeal is once again before us. 1 We said in that decision:
“Since the trial court made no findings on any increase in market value, this case is remanded for further proceedings with instructions to determine, by means of the market value test, if any special benefit was conferred.” 310 Minn. 41, 245 N.W.2d 451.
The remaining issue remains essentially the same: Whether the improvement proposed by the village conferred a special benefit upon the property in an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Meadowbrook Manor, Inc. v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Dorn v. A. J. Chromy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. City of Elk RiverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Sears v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- DeSutter v. Township of HelenaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Buzick v. City of BlaineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.