Buzick v. City of Blaine
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants, taxpayers, contest a judgment affirming respondent City of Blaine’s special assessment on their property. Appellants contend the evidence does not support the trial court’s findings that the property benefits from the improvement, that the assessment does not exceed the increase in value of the property due to the improvement and that the assessment is uniform. Appellants also argue that the trial court erred in refusing to admit their evidence based on the development cost approach to appraisal and in excluding evidence of an alleged conflict of interest on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- County of Ramsey v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Alstores Realty, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Anderson v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buzick v. City of BlaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Eagle Creek Townhomes, LLP v. City of ShakopeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000