Meadowbrook Manor, Inc. v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is a tax contest under M. S. A. 278.01 to challenge the assessment levied upon the appellant’s property. The district court dismissed the case on the ground that the challenge made was untimely. Meadow-brook Manor, Inc., which we will refer to as the taxpayer, is the owner of a real estate development in the city of St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Its property was assessed by the city for the sum of $44,402 as benefits for a sanitary sewer improvement. Although published notice of the assessment proceedings was given as required by statute, § 429.061, subd. 1, the taxpayer had…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Application of ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Dohrmann Co. v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.