Legal Opinion

In Re Assessment for Improving Superior Street

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1927No. 26,283PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Duluth & Iron Range Railroad Company appeals from a judgment confirming an assessment against its property. The assessment was levied by the city of Duluth to defray in part the cost of paving and constructing curb and gutter on East Superior street from Forty-fourth avenue east to McCulloch street, a distance of some three blocks. The street runs in an easterly and westerly direction and is bounded on its southerly side by the right of way of the railroad company, the right of way abutting upon the improvement being a strip of ground 100 feet in width and extending the length of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Matter of City of New York (Juniper Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API