Legal Opinion
McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 21, 1981PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParsket, J.
The plaintiff, Dorothy McCahill, and the defendant, Town & Country Associates, Ltd., entered into a contract for the construction of a garage. The plaintiff claims that the defendant’s work was defective and applied to the trial court for a prejudgment remedy to garnish property of the defendant. At the hearing held on August 12, 1980, both parties appeared and the trial court entered an order granting the plaintiff’s application.
The plaintiff had appended repair estimates to her complaint which were admitted into evidence by the court as business entries over the defendant’s hearsay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Kraus v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.