Legal Opinion

Damaras v. Dance

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1933No. 24377PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This was an action in replevin for a frigidaire or the value thereof in the sum of $152.17, the amount due on an installment contract. There was no defense at the trial of the cause other than some testimony introduced by the plaintiff in error, defendant below, relative to some payments.

It is not urged, nor even suggested, in the brief of plaintiff in error that he has a defense. A great deal of testimony is contained in the record dealing with certain payments and repairs, but on the appeal none of this testimony is mentioned, and no argument or claim of error is based thereon, and, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ackerman v. C. C. Chapell Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Home Appliance Store v. Anderson Hotels of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Protest of SweeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Holmes v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Sweeney v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Geiselmann v. RemlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API