Legal Opinion
Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 10, 1994No. 82973PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was sustained and Plaintiff appeals. Defendants move to dismiss the appeal as out of time. The question is whether a Motion for New Trial filed on November 1, 1993 was timely to extend the commencement of time to appeal. We hold that it was for the reason that we give our ruling prospective application in part, but on our own motion dismiss the appeal as premature.
CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE
Plaintiffs sued in the District Court of Tulsa County for damages caused by one of them being struck by a softball. On October 21, 1993 the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Aven v. ReehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Porter v. TayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- In the Matter of Estate of HeimbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- McMillian v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision v. PinarocSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Bushert v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.