Legal Opinion
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2011-1049PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
This Court previously dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint without prejudice for fail ure to state a claim. After plaintiffs filed a substantially revised amended complaint, defendants Union Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”) and BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) again have moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for lack of Article III standing. After carefully considering the arguments made by the parties in their papers and the oral arguments presented by counsel in court on January 8, 2015, the Court concludes that plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Figueroa v. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of SwedenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In Re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- 2301 M Cinema LLC v. Silver Cinemas Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- In re Disposable Contact Lens AntitrustDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- 2301 M Cinema LLC D/B/A West End Cinema v. Silver Cinemas Acquisition Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.