In Re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ [106] Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Defendants allege that the Consolidated Amended Complaint should be dismissed because Plaintiffs failed to plead facts sufficient to demonstrate that Plaintiffs suffered injury-in-fact and because Plaintiffs failed to plead factual allegations of a plausible price-fixing conspiracy in violation of federal antitrust laws. Upon consideration of the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re Delta/Airtran Baggage Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Kleen Products LLC v. International PaperDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2017
- Adelegan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.