Legal Opinion
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 22, 1994No. C3-94-1024PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Petitioners seek to invoke this court’s original jurisdiction pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 14.44 and 14.45 (1992) to challenge the validity of Minnesota Rule 2642.0400, subp. 6 (1986) as promulgated by the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Petitioners claim that the rule is invalid because (1) it exceeds the scope of the enabling statute, and (2) it violates the equal protection clauses of the state and federal constitutions. We declare the rule valid.
FACTS
Minnesota first began to regulate the hair care industry by creating the State Board of Hairdressing and Beauty Culture…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & IndustryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Application of AllersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Hawes v. 1997 Jeep Wrangler, Vin No. 1J4FY29POVP493248, License No. 874 PDGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.