Legal Opinion
Application of Allers
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 27, 1995No. C7-95-64, CX-95-172PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.
Relators John Alters and Konrad Stroh challenge the Public Employees Retirement Association’s (PERA) determination of their pensions. In particular, Alters claims PERA erred in (1) denying him early retirement incentives, (2) failing to include “income reserve days” as “salary,” and (3) altering his salary for the purpose of calculating his pension. Stroh joins Alters in contending that PERA exceeded its authority in refusing to include “income reserve days” and in refusing to include certain raises Stroh received for purposes of his pension calculation. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Matter of HildebrandtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re BrittainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In re the Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005