Sherman v. Hogland
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The appellee sought to have a conveyance of real estate, made to the appellant Rebecca Sherman, set aside as fraudulent, and obtained a decree setting it aside. Appellants unsuccessfully demurred to the amended complaint of appellee, and here present the question of the correctness of the ruling upon the demurrer. It is contended that the complaint is insufficient because it does not allege the value of the real estate charged to have been conveyed. Allegations of value are yery seldom material, and we ■do not think they are so in the present instance. We do not feel authorized to reverse…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McMahan v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Tenbrook v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Jaeger v. . KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lowry v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Albertoli v. BranhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.