Legal Opinion
Davis v. McCasland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1938No. 27273PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, ,T. J. .0.
McCasland, owner of property in a paving district in the city of Duncan, purchased some paving bonds and tendered them to the city clerk in payment of his paving assessments as permitted by chapter 5'8, S. L. 1933. Upon refusal of the clerk to accept the bonds, McCasland brought suit in mandamus against, the- clerk and the city, and the district court awarded him full relief. The city clerk and the city appeal, alleging the unconstitutionality of the 1933 law.
The validity and constitutionality of article 9, chapter 33, Session Laws 1935, is not involved herein and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Jefferson County v. BusbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Service Feed Co. v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Prince v. Ypsilanti Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Cranberry Creek Drainage District v. La VigneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Shinn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Baccus v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.