Legal Opinion
Versluis v. Town of Haskell, Okl.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1946No. 3197, 3198PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether two class actions brought by Leonard Versluis to collect unpaid paving assessments levied against property owned by the town of Haskell, Oklahoma and Union Graded School District No. 2 of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, are barred by the general statute of limitations. The cases were submitted to the trial court on the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, and since the issues involved are identical the two cases have been consolidated here on appeal. Jurisdiction is based solely upon diversity of citizenship and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McConnell v. CritchlowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Mcconnell v. CritchlowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Riley v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.