Williams v. Myer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. P. W. Forbes, W. D. Dehy, and P. H. Mack, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of plaintiff for a new trial.
The action was brought by plaintiff to quiet his title to a hundred inches of water of Pine Creek, in Inyo County, measured under a four-inch pressure, and conducted through dams, ditches, natural channels, and watercourses to and upon the lands of plaintiff; said hundred inches being alleged to be one half of two hundred inches under said pressure diverted by plaintiff and the grantor of defendant, and equally divided by them and used on their respective lands. In addition, plaintiff prayed for an injunction…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pomeroy v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Baumberger v. ArffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Turlock Golf & County Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Rosen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Armenta Ex Rel. City of Burbank v. Mueller Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Florence-Carlton Consolidated Schools District 15 & 6 v. District Court of the First Judicial District Ex Rel. County of Lewis & ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Bingham & G. Ry. Co. v. North Utah Mining Co. of BinghamUtah Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.