Legal Opinion
Rose v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1970No. 69-118 CivilPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The Court has under consideration the Motion of Third Party Defendant, Western Auto Supply Company (Western Auto), to Dismiss the Third Party Complaint filed against it by the Third Party Plaintiff, Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company (Railroad Company). The Third Party Plaintiff *1359opposes the Motion. Both parties have submitted briefs.
Proper consideration of the Motion requires an understanding of the action as originally filed. Plaintiff, Charles Rose, alleges he was injured while assisting in an attempt to open the door of a boxcar spotted for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Peak Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- National Mutual Ins. Co. Of the District of Columbia v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Beights v. W. R. Grace & Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
- Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Weil v. Dreher Pickle Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.