Legal Opinion
Beights v. W. R. Grace & Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 23, 1974No. Civ. No. 72-192-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiff brings this action against the Defendants W. R. Grace & Company (Grace) and The Murphy-Phoenix Company, Inc. (Murphy-Phoenix; for damages for personal injuries received in Plaintiff’s use of a product known as lub-adhesive manufactured by Defendant Murphy-Phoenix and sold by Defendant Grace. Plaintiff’s action is based on alleged negligence of and breach of express and implied warranties by said Defendants with reference to said product.
Under Rule 14, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Murphy-Phoenix as Third Party Plaintiff filed a Third…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peak Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Jennings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- D'OnOfriO Construction Company, Inc., Third-Party v. Recon Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Kantlehner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. v. DavilaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Central National Bank of Poteau v. McDanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Holzhauser v. Container Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Weil v. Dreher Pickle Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- In re CFS-Related Securities Fraud LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.