Legal Opinion

Wagenhals v. Flint

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1962No. 38,356, 38,357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

These actions were brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for injuries they sustained when their car collided with a truck which was owned and operated by the defendant. The verdicts were in favor of defendant and he was awarded damages on his counterclaim. From judgments thereafter entered the plaintiffs appeal.

On May 31, 1958, at about 6:30 in the evening, plaintiff Rupert Wagenhals (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) drove an automobile, in which his wife, Betty, was a passenger, in a southerly direction on Mesaba Avenue in the city of Duluth, and turned left, or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Norton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lapides v. WagenhalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Arteiro v. Coca Cola Bottling, Midwest, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  3. Wallace v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Kantar v. West End Air Conditioning Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API