Legal Opinion
Arteiro v. Coca Cola Bottling, Midwest, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 27, 1969No. 3-68-Civ-237PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
Following a special verdict for defendant, plaintiff Mario Arteiro as Trustee for the wrongful death of his son has moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of liability and a new trial on the damage issue, or in the alternative for a new trial on all issues. All relief requested is denied.
A motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b), Title 28 U.S. C.A., for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is to be granted “only for one reason — the absence of any substantial evidence to support the verdict.” 2B Barron & Holtzoff, Federal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Susan Nimrod, Etc. v. Stephen SylvesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- North Texas Producers Association v. Metzger Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Elinor M. Ratay v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Paul T. McNamara Administrator of the Estate of John Grigel, Deceased v. Ernest P. DionneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Guillermo Sanjuan, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ibp, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Miceli v. Interressantskapet Sea TransportDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Sanjuan v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.