Legal Opinion
Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 18, 1958No. 37,227, 37,231, 37,232, 37,396, 37,397, 37,480, 37,481PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from judgments and from various orders of the District Court of Big Stone County denying motions for judgment notwithstanding verdicts or for new trials in actions arising out of an automobile accident involving cars driven by one George Haugen and one Otto Schlimme. Henry Haugen was a guest passenger in the automobile driven by his brother, George. Cleo Okeson was a guest passenger in the car driven by Otto Schlimme, which automobile was alleged to have been the property of the Dick Thayer Motor Company. Individual actions were commenced by Henry Haugen and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Reese v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.