Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Broadwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1931No. Docket No. 594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

—This action and two companion cases (Anderson v. Broadwell, post, p. 150 [6 Pac. (2d) 267]; Broadwell v. Anderson, post, p. 145 [6 Pac. (2d) 269]) involve the title to three pieces of real property situated in Los Angeles County. The three cases were consolidated for trial and, while separate judgments were entered and separate appeals taken, by stipulation, all three eases have been here presented upon a single transcript and one set of briefs. All of the parties are closely related and, as frequently happens in such cases, the actions have been fought with much zeal and some bitterness.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Arnold v. LoomisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Anderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Broadwell v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Adams v. TalbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Anderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Dreher v. RohrmoserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API