Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Broadwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1931No. Docket No. 595PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This action was tried with Anderson v. Broadwell, (No. 594) ante, p. 130 [6 Pac. (2d) 260], and Broadwell v. Anderson, (No. 596) ante, p. 145 [6 Pac. (2d) 269], this day decided, and relates to what was called by the parties the “El Monte property”. In his complaint the plaintiff seeks to have his title quieted to an undivided one-half interest in tíie property, alleging title in himself in a first cause of action, and, in a second cause of action, that he paid one-half of the purchase price of the property upon the understanding and agreement that he was to have an undivided one-half…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Huffman v. MulkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Arnold v. LoomisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Anderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Broadwell v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Abbey v. LordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Anderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Nazzisi v. NazzisiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Alderman v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API