Legal Opinion

Dreher v. Rohrmoser

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1955No. Civ. 20900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

Defendant, George J. Rohrmoser, «was employed by plaintiff, who was a general contractor and builder of homes.

Through a real estate broker, plaintiff bought two lots in Wilmington for $2,000, which amount he paid into escrow. At that time he told defendant George that he wanted to put the lots in his (defendant’s) name “for convenience sake, so that he could get the permits and the titles and the loan.” And thus expedite the construction of two houses on the lots. Defendant agreed to this arrangement.

Accordingly, a grant deed to “Geo. J. Rohrmoser, a married man” was executed by Charles V.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. De Leonis v. HammelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Anderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Wilson v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. UhlmannArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. King v. UhlmannArizona Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API