Legal Opinion

H & B American Mach. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1935No. M-381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The plaintiff duly filed its income and profits tax returns for the years 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919, and 1921, and paid the taxes shown to be due thereon. Subsequently, on December 14, 1925, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue made an additional assessment of $4,158.30 for the year 1916, $62,785.53 for the year 1917, and $254,710.-56 for the year 1918.

On December 19, 1925, the Commissioner determined an overassessment in favor of plaintiff of $58,929.86 for the year 1919 and $204,036.43 for the year 1921, which amounts, as overpayments, were, on April 16, 1926, credited to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Hagan v. Scottish InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Gunn v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. United States v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Individually, as of the Estate of Gertrude Witbeck Hanlin and as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Harris Trust & Savings BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API