Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 17, 1967No. 64 C 1051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.

The government brings this action for the collection of federal estate taxes previously assessed and allegedly due from the estate of Gertrude Witbeck Hanlin (hereinafter referred to as “decedent”). Defendant, Harris Trust and Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as “Harris”), is the executor of the estate and trustee of five trusts created by the will of the decedent. The other defendants are surviving beneficiaries of the trusts and legatees under the will. Relief is sought against these individual defendants only to the extent of the value of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. MorganDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1962
  3. H & B American Mach. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Individually, as of the Estate of Gertrude Witbeck Hanlin and as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  2. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API