Legal Opinion

Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1930No. 118 and 414PublishedCited by 257 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

These cases, which were argued together, present the same questions. In each case, the taxpayer seeks to recover with interest an amount assessed and collected, after March 15, 1925, as an additional income and excess-profits tax for 1918 under the Revenue Act of 1918. In each, the claim is that both the assessment and the collection were made after the expiration of the time allowed therefor. In a long line of cases arising out of similar facts, the Board of Tax Appeals has held consistently that neither, the assessment nor the collection was made too late. In No. 414 the action was brought…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by257 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Beard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. Espinoza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. United States v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API