Legal Opinion

In Re McVickers

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1946No. Crim. 4680Published

1Opinion of the Court

29 Cal.2d 264 (1946)

In re JOHN FRANCIS McVICKERS, on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 4680.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 3, 1946.

John Francis McVickers, in pro. per., for Petitioner.

Robert W. Kenney, Attorney General, Jess Hession, Assistant Attorney General, and James O. Reavis, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.

SCHAUER, J.

Petitioner, by application for the writ of habeas corpus, seeks review of the adjudication or finding that he, "having been previously three times convicted, upon charges separately brought and tried, and having served separate terms therefor in state and/or…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API