Legal Opinion
City of Aberdeen v. Rich
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUCKER, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] The City of Aberdeen (City) brought this declaratory judgement action against defendants to determine if two separate land transactions with City should be declared null and void due to an interest in the transactions by the city mayor in violation of SDCL 6-1-1. SDCL 6-1-1 provides in pertinent part:
It shall be unlawful for any officer of a county, municipality, township or school district who has been elected or appointed, to be interested, ... in any contract entered into by said county, municipality, township or school district ... in the purchase of any real…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. StofferahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Carlson v. City of FaithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Speckels v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Purdy v. FlemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Aberdeen v. RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- McLAEN v. WHITE TOWNSHIPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- City of Aberdeen v. RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Milbank Insurance Company v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.