Legal Opinion

Carlson v. City of Faith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1954No. File 9399, 9414, 9417PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeedom, J.

The three cases entitled above grow out of a common factual situation. The issue is the same in all three. We dispose of them with this one opinion.

Each individual appellant named above, while a member of the city council of the city of Faith, sold the city goods and merchandise and received and retained payment therefor. Respondents, taxpayers of Faith, brought this action in behalf of themselves and all other taxpayers for recovery into the city treasury of all money thus paid out to the councilmen. Respondents’ actions are grounded on statutory provisions expressly declaring unlawful the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Neisius v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carlson v. West River Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. City of Bangor v. RidleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  5. Branson v. BransonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hauck v. BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Heese v. WenkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. City of Aberdeen v. RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API